Persistent Delocalized States in Vacuum Region for Bi Surface Calculation

Problems running VASP: crashes, internal errors, "wrong" results.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
akuklin
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 8:46 am

Persistent Delocalized States in Vacuum Region for Bi Surface Calculation

#1 Post by akuklin » Thu Nov 14, 2024 9:35 am

Hello VASP community,

I am encountering an unusual issue while calculating the ELFCAR of a Bi surface using the PBE functional. The results reveal a significant presence of delocalized states throughout the vacuum region. Delocalized electronic states appear distinctly in the vacuum region, not extending directly from the surface, but rather appearing independently within the vacuum. This behaviour suggests these states may be artefacts rather than physical features.
I also calculated LOCPOT which changes quite a lot in the vacuum region (see attachments)

Here are the specific details of my setup and observations:
PREC= high
GGA = PE
IVDW = 11
Electronic Relaxation 1
NELM = 80;
EDIFF = 1E-04 stopping-criterion for ELM
Ionic Relaxation c-
NSW = 0 number of steps for IOM
NBLOCK = 1;
IBRION = -1 ionic relax: 0-MD 1-quasi-New 2-CG
ISIF = 2 stress and relaxation
ISYM = 2
LCORR = T Harris-correction to forces
LDIAG = T
LCHARG = .T.
EDIFFG = -1E-02
ISPIN = 1
LWAVE =.T.
LVTOT = T
LELF = T
ISMEAR = -5;
IALGO = 38 algorithm
SIGMA = .05 broadening in eV -4-tet -1-fermi 0-gaus
LREAL = A real-space projection
NCORE = 4
LSCALU = .F.
LASPH = .TRUE.
LORBIT = 11
NEDOS = 5000
ENCUT = 500
A vacuum thickness was over 20 Å, ensuring minimal interaction between periodic images.

I believe that states could be a numerical artefact, perhaps related to the functional but not sure 100%. I attempted calculations using SCAN, which completely eliminated these vacuum states, suggesting they may indeed be artefacts of PBE. However, when using HSE06, the delocalized states persist, though they are less pronounced.
Would it be worthwhile to test a GW calculation for this system, or are there adjustments within DFT that could better address this issue and make me 100% sure that this is an artefact?
Any insights or suggestions would be highly appreciated, especially from those who have experience with surface calculations and dealing with spurious vacuum states in similar setups.

Thank you!

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

henrique_miranda
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 494
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:41 pm
Contact:

Re: Persistent Delocalized States in Vacuum Region for Bi Surface Calculation

#2 Post by henrique_miranda » Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:04 am

Could you share the INCAR, KPOINTS, OUTCAR and OSZICAR of the calculations with the different functionals: PBE, HSE06 and SCAN?
Calculations with a lot of vacuum tend to be hard to converge, before trying to answer your question we should make sure that the calculations converged properly.


Post Reply