frequency calculations

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
mhyman
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:37 pm

frequency calculations

#1 Post by mhyman » Mon May 22, 2006 8:12 pm

Hello,

I've been performing frequency calculations on oxygen-oxygen stretches. I've performed frequency calculations of O2 on Pt(111) to compare with Eichler and Hafner's work PRL V79 p.4481 (1997), which compare very favorably to experiment. I've used a slightly different calculation setup -

3 frozen substrate layers
1/9 ML O2 coverage
PAW potentials
5x5x1 Monkhorst Pack k-point mesh
ENCUT = 400
POTIM = 0.04

For both the magnetic (top-bridge-top) and nonmagnetic (top-fcc-bridge) states, my adsorption energies and geometries compare very well to Eichler and Hafner's values. And the O-O stretching frequency for the magnetic state is very close (within 3 cm-1). However, the O-O stretch for the nonmagnetic state is 826cm-1, compared to 690 cm-1 calculated by Eichler/Hafner. The optimized geometry was converged with forces on the oxygen atoms are < 0.005 eV/A. Can anyone offer suggestions as to what is going on?

Thanks,
Matt
Last edited by mhyman on Mon May 22, 2006 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

alex
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
License Nr.: 5-67
Location: Germany

frequency calculations

#2 Post by alex » Wed May 24, 2006 2:57 pm

How do your values compare to experiment? That's always the perfect test ...
Was the coverage the same as in Hafner/Eichler's work?
Have you used decent pseudopotentials for oxygen? O-O bond comes with r=124pm, so O_s is too bad in forces, but might give reasonable structures ...

Hth
Alex
Last edited by alex on Wed May 24, 2006 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

mhyman
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:37 pm

frequency calculations

#3 Post by mhyman » Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:46 am

That's the thing. Structures and energies agree very well. It's just the frequency. The frequencies calculated by Eichler and Hafner compare very favorably to experiment. The question is: why would the frequency be so far off when everything else is correct?
Last edited by mhyman on Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply