Coulomb singularity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
\frac{\text{erf}(\lambda R_{\text{c}})}{2\lambda^{2}}\right) | \frac{\text{erf}(\lambda R_{\text{c}})}{2\lambda^{2}}\right) | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
== Related tags and articles == | |||
{{TAG|HFRCUT}} | |||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
---- | |||
[[Category:Exchange-correlation functionals]][[Category:Hybrid_functionals]][[Category:Theory]] |
Revision as of 12:13, 10 May 2022
The bare Coulomb operator
in the unscreened HF exchange has a representation in the reciprocal space that is given by
It has a singularity at , and to alleviate this issue and to improve the convergence of the exact exchange with respect to the supercell size (or the k-point mesh density) different methods have been proposed: the auxiliary function methods[1], probe-charge Ewald [2] (HFALPHA), and Coulomb truncation methods[3] (HFRCUT). These mostly involve modifying the Coulomb Kernel in a way that yields the same result as the unmodified kernel in the limit of large supercell sizes. These methods are described below.
Probe-charge Ewald method
Auxiliary function methods
Truncation methods
In this method the bare Coulomb operator is truncated by multiplying it by the step function , and in the reciprocal this leads to
whose value at is finite and is given by . The screened Coulomb operators
and
have representations in the reciprocal space that are given by
and
respectively. Thus, the screened potentials have no singularity at . Nevertheless, it is still beneficial for accelerating the convergence with respect to the number of k-points to multiply these screened operators by , which in the reciprocal space gives
and
respectively, with the following values at :
and