Coulomb singularity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
To alleviate this issue and to improve the convergence of the exact exchange with respect to the supercell size (or the k-point mesh density) different methods have been proposed: the auxiliary function methods{{cite|gygi:prb:86}}, probe-charge Ewald {{cite|massidda:prb:93}} ({{TAG|HFALPHA}}), and Coulomb truncation methods{{cite|spenceralavi:prb:08}} ({{TAG|HFRCUT}}). | To alleviate this issue and to improve the convergence of the exact exchange with respect to the supercell size (or the k-point mesh density) different methods have been proposed: the auxiliary function methods{{cite|gygi:prb:86}}, probe-charge Ewald {{cite|massidda:prb:93}} ({{TAG|HFALPHA}}), and Coulomb truncation methods{{cite|spenceralavi:prb:08}} ({{TAG|HFRCUT}}). | ||
These mostly involve modifying the Coulomb Kernel in a way that yields the same result as the unmodified kernel in the limit of large supercell sizes. | These mostly involve modifying the Coulomb Kernel in a way that yields the same result as the unmodified kernel in the limit of large supercell sizes. | ||
=== Truncation method === |
Revision as of 09:14, 10 May 2022
In the unscreened HF exchange, the bare Coulomb operator
is singular in the reciprocal space at :
To alleviate this issue and to improve the convergence of the exact exchange with respect to the supercell size (or the k-point mesh density) different methods have been proposed: the auxiliary function methods[1], probe-charge Ewald [2] (HFALPHA), and Coulomb truncation methods[3] (HFRCUT). These mostly involve modifying the Coulomb Kernel in a way that yields the same result as the unmodified kernel in the limit of large supercell sizes.