SPRING: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references> | <references> | ||
<ref name="jons95">G. Mills, H. Jonsson and G. K. Schenter, Surface | <ref name="jons95">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(94)00731-4 G. Mills, H. Jonsson and G. K. Schenter, Surface | ||
Science, 324, 305 (1995)</ref> | Science, 324, 305 (1995).]</ref> | ||
<ref name="jons98">H. Jonsson, G. Mills and K. W. Jacobsen, | <ref name="jons98">H. Jonsson, G. Mills and K. W. Jacobsen, | ||
''Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Minimum Energy Paths of | ''Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Minimum Energy Paths of | ||
Transitions'', | Transitions'', | ||
in ''Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations'', | in ''Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations'', | ||
ed. B. J. Berne, G. Ciccotti and D. F. Coker (World Scientific, 1998)</ref> | ed. B. J. Berne, G. Ciccotti and D. F. Coker (World Scientific, 1998).</ref> | ||
</references> | </references> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== Related Tags and Sections == | == Related Tags and Sections == | ||
{{TAG|IMAGES}} | {{TAG|IMAGES}} |
Revision as of 15:20, 11 February 2011
SPRING = [integer]
Default: SPRING = -5
Description: SPRING gives the spring constant between the images as used in the elastic band method
SPRING has to be set together with IMAGES if the elastic band method is used to calculate energy barriers between two ionic configurations of a system.
For SPRING = 0, each image is only allowed to move into the direction perpendicular to the current hyper-tangent, which is calculated as the normal vector between two neighboring images. This algorithm keeps the distance between the images constant to first order. It is therefore possible to start with a dense image spacing around the saddle point to obtain a finer resolution around this point.
The nudged elastic band method[1][2] is applied when SPRING is set to a negative value e.g.
SPRING= -5
This is also the recommended setting. Compared to the previous case, additional tangential springs are introduced to keep the images equidistant during the relaxation (remember the constraint is only conserved to first order otherwise). Do not use too large values, because this can slow down convergence. The default value usually works quite reliably.
One problem of the nudged elastic band method is that the constraint (i.e movements only in the hyper-plane perpendicular to the current tangent) is non linear. Therefore, the CG algorithm usually fails to converge, and we recommended to use the RMM-DIIS algorithm (IBRION=1) or the quick-min algorithm (IBRION=3). Additionally, the non-linear constraint (equidistant images) tends to be violated significantly during the first few steps (it is only enforced to first order). If this problem is encountered, a very low dimensionality parameter (IBRION=1, NFREE=2) should be applied in the first we steps, or a steepest descent minimization without line optimization (IBRION=3, SMASS=2). should be used, to pre-converge the images.
References
- ↑ [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(94)00731-4 G. Mills, H. Jonsson and G. K. Schenter, Surface Science, 324, 305 (1995).]
- ↑ H. Jonsson, G. Mills and K. W. Jacobsen, Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Minimum Energy Paths of Transitions, in Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations, ed. B. J. Berne, G. Ciccotti and D. F. Coker (World Scientific, 1998).