Estimation of J magnetic coupling: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Description: Estimation of the J magnetic coupling using the GGA+U method | Description: Estimation of the J magnetic exchange coupling using the GGA+U method. | ||
Using the relation J = (EFM - EAFM) / 4, antiferromagnetic (AFM) and ferromagnetic (FM) configurations have to be studied | Switching off the symmetry ([[ISYM|ISYM]] = 0 | -1) is often necessary to generate different magnetic configurations. Using the relation J = (EFM - EAFM) / 4, antiferromagnetic (AFM) and ferromagnetic (FM) configurations have to be studied. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
ISPIN = 2 | ISPIN = 2 | ||
MAGMOM = 2.0 -2.0 2*0 # AFM conf. | MAGMOM = 2.0 -2.0 2*0 # AFM conf. | ||
#MAGMOM = 2*2.0 2*0 # FM conf. | # MAGMOM = 2*2.0 2*0 # FM conf. | ||
Mixer | Mixer | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Necessarely, the J magnetic coupling decreases with the increasing of the | Necessarely, the J magnetic coupling decreases with the increasing of the U{{sub|eff}} value. To assess the obtain value, similar calculations could be done using a [[NiO HSE06|hybrid functional]]. | ||
== Download == | == Download == |
Revision as of 11:48, 25 August 2016
Description: Estimation of the J magnetic exchange coupling using the GGA+U method.
Switching off the symmetry (ISYM = 0 | -1) is often necessary to generate different magnetic configurations. Using the relation J = (EFM - EAFM) / 4, antiferromagnetic (AFM) and ferromagnetic (FM) configurations have to be studied.
- INCAR
NiO GGA+U AFM SYSTEM = "NiO" Electronic minimization ENCUT = 450 EDIFF = 1E-4 LORBIT = 11 LREAL = .False. ISTART = 0 ISYM = -1 NELMIN = 6 DOS ISMEAR = -5 Magnetism ISPIN = 2 MAGMOM = 2.0 -2.0 2*0 # AFM conf. # MAGMOM = 2*2.0 2*0 # FM conf. Mixer AMIX = 0.2 BMIX = 0.00001 AMIX_MAG = 0.8 BMIX_MAG = 0.00001 GGA+U LDAU = .TRUE. LDAUTYPE = 2 LDAUL = 2 -1 LDAUU = 5.00 0.00 LDAUJ = 0.00 0.00 LDAUPRINT = 2 LMAXMIX = 4
- KPOINTS
k-points 0 gamma 4 4 4 0 0 0
- POSCAR
NiO 4.17 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 2 2 Cartesian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Necessarely, the J magnetic coupling decreases with the increasing of the UTemplate:Sub value. To assess the obtain value, similar calculations could be done using a hybrid functional.
Download
To the list of examples or to the main page