Pulay stress: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
No edit summary
 
(279 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Pseudopotential calculations are calculate the energy of a cell using a finite number of plane waves and a finite number of k-points. When comparing between cells of different sizes, i.e.g volume, this results in them each having different plane wave basis sets. This would be solved by using an infinite number of k-points and plane waves. In practice, a large enough plane wave energy cutoff and number of k-points leads to converged energies.{{cite|payne:francis:1990}} However, when the basis set is too small, i.e. prematurely truncated, this results in discontinuities in the total energy between cells of varying volumes. These discontinuities between energy and volume creates stress that decreases the volume compared to fully converged calculations, due to the diagonal components of the stress tensor being incorrect. This is "Pulay stress". Figures 1 and 2 shows these discontinuities for diamond relative for small energy cutoffs and k-point meshes, respectively, in comparison to converged curves.
Pulay stress is unphysical stress resulting from unconverged calculations with respect to the basis set. It distorts the cell structure, decreasing it from the equilibrium volume and creating difficulties in volume relaxation. The resultant energy vs. volume curves, cf. Figure 1 (top), are jagged and special care must be taken to obtain reasonable structures, cf. [[volume relaxation|Volume relaxation]]. In this article, the computational origin of this is discussed. [[File:Pressure_energy_volume.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1. Total energy (left y-axis) and absolute pressure (right y-axis) vs. lattice parameter. Equilibrium lattice parameters for energy and pressure are shown. These coincide when Pulay stress is eliminated. ENCUT = 250 eV (top - unconverged) and 540 eV (bottom - converged). Diamond in a primitive cell - 2x2x2 k-point mesh.]]It is important to note that problems due to the Pulay stress can often be neglected if only volume-conserving relaxations are performed. This is because the Pulay stress is, usually, nearly uniform and only changes the diagonal elements of the stress tensor by a constant amount.


[[File:ENCUT_comp.png|300px|thumb|Fig 1. Total energy vs lattice parameter for converged and unconverged plane wave energy cutoffs. Diamond in a primitive cell.]]
= Introduction =
[[File:Kpoint_comp.png|300px|thumb|Fig 2. Total energy vs lattice parameter for converged and unconverged k-point meshes. Diamond in a primitive cell.]]
The energy for a periodic system, e.g. band structures, is calculated using a finite number of plane waves and a finite number of k-points. A fixed number of plane waves or plane wave energy cutoff may be used to set a constant basis.{{cite|gomesdacosta:nielsen:kunc:1986}} In VASP, a constant energy cutoff is used, cf. {{TAG|ENCUT}}. The number of plane waves <b><i><span>N</span></b><sub>PW</sub></i> (Note: the number of plane waves in VASP can be found using by searching for ''NPLWV'' in the {{TAG|OUTCAR}} file) is related to the energy cutoff <b><i><span>E</span></b><sub>cutoff</sub></i> and the size of the cell <span>'''&Omega;'''</span><sub>0</sub>:
::<math> N_{PW} \propto\ \Omega_0\ E_{cutoff}^{3/2} </math>


== Calculating in VASP ==
<b><i><span>N</span></b><sub>PW</sub></i> is constant in a relaxation calculation, which means that <b><i><span>E</span></b><sub>cutoff</sub></i> must change to compensate for changes in <span>'''&Omega;'''</span><sub>0</sub>. All the initial G-vectors within a sphere are included in the basis. However, when comparing cells of different sizes, i.e. during a relaxation, the cell shape is relaxed, so the direct and reciprocal lattice vectors change. The number of reciprocal G-vectors in the basis is kept fixed but the length of the G-vectors changes, indirectly changing the energy cutoff. In other words, the shape of the cutoff region changes from a sphere to an ellipsoid. This can be solved by using an infinite number of k-points and plane waves. In practice, a large enough plane wave energy cutoff and number of k-points leads to converged energies.{{cite|payne:francis:1990}} All energy changes are strictly consistent with the stress tensor; however, when the basis set is too small, i.e. prematurely truncated, this results in discontinuities in the total energy between cells of varying volumes. These discontinuities between energy and volume create stress that decreases the equilibrium volume (cf. Fig. 1 (top)), due to the diagonal components of the stress tensor being incorrect. This is called the ''Pulay stress''.


One way that Pulay stress may be considered by calculating the relaxed structure with a large basis-set.
The pressure of the cell, being proportional to the trace of the stress tensor, can be used to visualize this. When the cell volume is below the equilibrium volume, the pressure is positive; contrastingly, it is negative when above the equilibrium volume, so at equilibrium, this is zero. Plotting the magnitude of the pressure vs. volume curve and the total energy allows comparison between these two minima. In Figure 1 it is clear that the the absolute pressure-volume and energy-volume minima coincide for a converged basis, while the pressure equilibrium is much lower than the energy equilibrium for the unconverged basis. This is the effect of the Pulay stress.
*Set {{TAG|ENCUT}} to <math>1.3\times</math> the default cutoff or {{TAG|PREC}}=''High'' in VASP.4.4.
*Re-run VASP with the default cutoff to obtain the final relaxed positions and cell parameters.  
A good estimation for the Pulay stress is given in the {{TAG|OUTCAR}} file as a negative pressure:
  external pressure =    -100.29567 kB


== Accurate bulk relaxations with internal parameters (one) ==
= Further explanation =
As mentioned previously, <b><i><span>N</span></b><sub>PW</sub></i> is constant in a relaxation calculation, which means that <b><i><span>E</span></b><sub>cutoff</sub></i> must change to compensate for changes in <span>'''&Omega;'''</span><sub>0</sub>. This is illustrated in Fig. 2. The initial G-vectors within a sphere are included within the basis.


Volume relaxation at the default energy cutoff should be avoided whenever possible. One way that Pulay stress may be considered by calculating the relaxed structure with a large basis-set.  
When the cell volume increases (<b><span>V</span></b><sub>1</sub> < <b><span>V</span></b><sub>1</sub>), the number of G-vectors in reciprocal space remains constant, but their length increases (cf. Fig. 2 (top)). This effectively results in a change of basis, leading to (<b><i><span>E</span></b><sub>cutoff, 1</sub></i> > <b><i><span>E</span></b><sub>cutoff, 2</sub></i>). This basis remains constant for the duration of the relaxation. However, if the calculation is then restarted, the basis is reset. This means that the number of G-vectors is greater for the larger, real-space cell. One effect of this is that there are more real-space grid points. However, the corresponding reciprocal space decreases.  


The general message is: whenever possible avoid volume relaxation at the default energy cutoff. Either increase the basis set by setting {{TAG|ENCUT}} manually in the {{TAG|INCAR}} file, or use the method two suggested below. This avoids doing volume relaxations at all. If volume relaxations are the only possible and feasible option please use the following step by step procedure (which minimizes errors to a minimum):
Contrastingly, see Fig. 2 (bottom), when the volume decreases on relaxation (<b><span>V</span></b><sub>1</sub> > <b><span>V</span></b><sub>1</sub>), the length of the G-vectors decreases. The effective <b><i><span>E</span></b><sub>cutoff</sub></i> should increase but this does not improve the situation, as it creates an artificial pressure. The reciprocal space grid points are effectively sparser. If the calculation restarts, the basis is reset, so the number of G-vectors decreases for the smaller real space cell.


ONE:
[[File:Pulay_stress_grids.png|700px|thumb|centre|Figure 2. Cell shape and lattice positions are kept constant, while the volume <b><span>V</span></b> is free to change (ISIF = 7). The initial volume <b><span>V</span></b><sub>1</sub> changes to the final volume <b><span>V</span></b><sub>2</sub>. Two cases are given, one for volume increasing on relaxation (top) and one for it decreasing (bottom). The change in real space is given on the left, while the change in reciprocal space and the subsequent effect on the G-vectors is given on the right. Blue is the initial basis, while red is the new, restarted basis. The relation between <b><i><span>E</span></b><sub>cutoff</sub></i>, <b><i><span>N</span></b><sub>PW</sub></i>, and G-vectors is given for the initial and final volumes.]]
*Relax from starting structure ({{TAG|ISMEAR}} should be 0 or 1).
*Start a second relaxation from previous {{TAG|CONTCAR}} file (re-relaxation).
*As a final step, perform one more energy calculation using the tetrahedron method switched on (i.e. {{TAG|ISMEAR}}=-5), to obtain highly accurate energies (no relaxation for the final run). Possibly increase the energy cutoff even further.
<ref>A few things should be remarked here: never used the energy obtained at the end of a relaxation run, if you allow for cell shape relaxations (the final basis set might not correspond to the desired spherical cutoff sphere). Instead, perform one additional static run after completing the relaxation. If the relaxation will yield a structure with reasonably small structural "errors", the final error in the energy of step 3 is only of second-order (with respect to the structural errors). If you take the energy directly from the relaxation run, errors are usually significantly larger. Another important point is that the most reliable results for the relaxation are obtained if the starting cell parameters are very close to the final cell parameters. If different runs yield different results, then the one run that started from the configuration, which was closest to the relaxed structure, is the most reliable one.


We strongly recommend doing any volume (and to a lesser extent cell shape) relaxation with an increased basis set. {{TAG|ENCUT}}=<math>1.3\times</math> default cutoff is reasonable accurate in most cases. {{TAG|PREC}}=''High'' does also increase the energy cutoff by a factor of 1.25. At an increased cutoff the Pulay-stress correction is usually not required.</ref>
Alternatively, the shape of the cell could change. As the shape changes, the G-vectors continue to be directed along the lattice coordinates, meaning that some shorten while others lengthen, see Fig. 3. This results in a shift from a spherical basis, where all G-vectors are of equal length, to one where some are stretched and others compressed, i.e. an ellipsoid. This changes the effective <b><i><span>E</span></b><sub>cutoff</sub></i> along each lattice parameter. On resetting the calculation, the cutoff is once again spherical. This draws an analogy to the symmetry breaking of the Bravais lattice seen for gradient-corrected functionals (cf. {{TAG|GGA_COMPAT}}), where the spherical symmetry of the G-vectors is broken for non-cubic cells.
 
Finally, if the default cutoff is used for the relaxation, the {{TAG|PSTRESS}} tag should be set in the {{TAG|INCAR}} file: evaluate the Pulay stress along the guidelines given in the previous section and add an input line to the {{TAG|INCAR}} file reading (usually a negative number):
{{TAG|PSTRESS}} = Pulay stress
From now on all ''STRESS'' output of VASP is corrected by simply subtracting {{TAG|PSTRESS}}. In addition, all volume relaxations will take {{TAG|PSTRESS}} into account.  
It should be said again, use {{TAG|PSTRESS}} only if increasing the cutoff is not a viable option for some reason.
 
== Accurate bulk relaxations with internal parameters (two) ==
 
It is possible to avoid volume relaxation in many cases: The method we have used quite often in the past is to relax the structure (cell shape and internal parameters) for a set of fixed volumes ({{TAG|ISIF}}=4). The final equilibrium volume and the ground-state energy can be obtained by a fit to an equation of state. The reason why this method is better than volume relaxation is that the Pulay stress is almost isotropic, and thus adds only a constant value to the diagonal elements of the stress tensor. Therefore, the relaxation for a fixed volume will yield highly accurate structures.
 
The outline for such a calculation is almost the same as in the previous section. But in this case, one has to do the calculations for a set of fixed volumes. At first sight, this seems to be much more expensive than method number one (outlined in the previous section). But in many cases, the additional costs are only small, because the internal parameters do not change very much from volume to volume. The following steps have to be done in these calculations:
*Select one volume and relax from starting structure keeping the volume fixed ({{TAG|ISIF}}=4; {{TAG|ISMEAR}}=0 or 1).
*Start a second relaxation from the previous {{TAG|CONTCAR}} file (if the initial cell shape was reasonable this step can be skipped if the cell shape is kept fixed, you never have run VASP twice).
*As a final step, perform one more energy calculation with the tetrahedron method switched on ({{TAG|ISMEAR}}=-5), to get very accurate unambiguous energies (no relaxation for the final run).
 
The method has also other advantages, for instance, the bulk modulus is readily available. We have found in the past that this method can be used safely with the default cutoff.


[[File:Shape_pulay_grids.png|700px|thumb|centre|Figure 3. Cell volume and lattice positions are kept constant, while the shape is free to change (ISIF = 5). The shape changes from cubic to hexagonal. The blue spherical basis changes to the red ellipsoid basis, along the direction of the sheer. On restarting, a spherical basis returns.]]


[[Category:Ionic minimization]][[Category:Howto]]


== FAQ: Why is my energy vs. volume plot jagged ==
==References==
 
This is a very common question from people who start to do calculations with plane wave codes. There are two reasons why the energy vs. volume plot looks jagged:
 
*Basis set incompleteness. The basis set is discrete and incomplete, and when the volume changes, additional plane waves are added. That causes small discontinuous changes in the energy.
**Solutions:
***Use a larger plane wave cutoff: This is usually the preferred and simplest solution.
***Use more k-points : this solves the problem, because the criterion for including a plane wave in the basis set is <math>\vert {\bf G} + {\bf k} \vert < {\bf G}_{\rm cut}</math>. This means at each k-point a different basis set is used, and additional plane waves are added at each k-point at different volumes. In turn, the energy vs. volume curve becomes smoother.
*A second possible reason for the jagged E(V) curve is the use of {{TAG|PREC}}=Normal. For {{TAG|PREC}}=Accurate the FFT grids are chosen such that <math> {\bf H} \vert \phi> </math> is exactly evaluated. For {{TAG|PREC}}=Normal the FFT grids are set to 3/4 of the value that is required for an exact evaluation of <math> {\bf H} \vert \phi> </math>. This introduces small errors because when the volume changes the FFT grids change discontinuously. In other words, at each volume a different FFT grid is used, causing the energy to jump discontinuously between different volumes.
**Solutions:
***Use PREC=Accurate, or increase the plane wave cutoff.
***Set your FFT grids manually, and choose the one that is used per default for the largest volume (obviously a laborious solution).
 
----
[[Category:Ionic minimization]][[Category:Howto]]

Latest revision as of 09:11, 30 August 2024

Pulay stress is unphysical stress resulting from unconverged calculations with respect to the basis set. It distorts the cell structure, decreasing it from the equilibrium volume and creating difficulties in volume relaxation. The resultant energy vs. volume curves, cf. Figure 1 (top), are jagged and special care must be taken to obtain reasonable structures, cf. Volume relaxation. In this article, the computational origin of this is discussed.

Figure 1. Total energy (left y-axis) and absolute pressure (right y-axis) vs. lattice parameter. Equilibrium lattice parameters for energy and pressure are shown. These coincide when Pulay stress is eliminated. ENCUT = 250 eV (top - unconverged) and 540 eV (bottom - converged). Diamond in a primitive cell - 2x2x2 k-point mesh.

It is important to note that problems due to the Pulay stress can often be neglected if only volume-conserving relaxations are performed. This is because the Pulay stress is, usually, nearly uniform and only changes the diagonal elements of the stress tensor by a constant amount.

Introduction

The energy for a periodic system, e.g. band structures, is calculated using a finite number of plane waves and a finite number of k-points. A fixed number of plane waves or plane wave energy cutoff may be used to set a constant basis.[1] In VASP, a constant energy cutoff is used, cf. ENCUT. The number of plane waves NPW (Note: the number of plane waves in VASP can be found using by searching for NPLWV in the OUTCAR file) is related to the energy cutoff Ecutoff and the size of the cell Ω0:

NPW is constant in a relaxation calculation, which means that Ecutoff must change to compensate for changes in Ω0. All the initial G-vectors within a sphere are included in the basis. However, when comparing cells of different sizes, i.e. during a relaxation, the cell shape is relaxed, so the direct and reciprocal lattice vectors change. The number of reciprocal G-vectors in the basis is kept fixed but the length of the G-vectors changes, indirectly changing the energy cutoff. In other words, the shape of the cutoff region changes from a sphere to an ellipsoid. This can be solved by using an infinite number of k-points and plane waves. In practice, a large enough plane wave energy cutoff and number of k-points leads to converged energies.[2] All energy changes are strictly consistent with the stress tensor; however, when the basis set is too small, i.e. prematurely truncated, this results in discontinuities in the total energy between cells of varying volumes. These discontinuities between energy and volume create stress that decreases the equilibrium volume (cf. Fig. 1 (top)), due to the diagonal components of the stress tensor being incorrect. This is called the Pulay stress.

The pressure of the cell, being proportional to the trace of the stress tensor, can be used to visualize this. When the cell volume is below the equilibrium volume, the pressure is positive; contrastingly, it is negative when above the equilibrium volume, so at equilibrium, this is zero. Plotting the magnitude of the pressure vs. volume curve and the total energy allows comparison between these two minima. In Figure 1 it is clear that the the absolute pressure-volume and energy-volume minima coincide for a converged basis, while the pressure equilibrium is much lower than the energy equilibrium for the unconverged basis. This is the effect of the Pulay stress.

Further explanation

As mentioned previously, NPW is constant in a relaxation calculation, which means that Ecutoff must change to compensate for changes in Ω0. This is illustrated in Fig. 2. The initial G-vectors within a sphere are included within the basis.

When the cell volume increases (V1 < V1), the number of G-vectors in reciprocal space remains constant, but their length increases (cf. Fig. 2 (top)). This effectively results in a change of basis, leading to (Ecutoff, 1 > Ecutoff, 2). This basis remains constant for the duration of the relaxation. However, if the calculation is then restarted, the basis is reset. This means that the number of G-vectors is greater for the larger, real-space cell. One effect of this is that there are more real-space grid points. However, the corresponding reciprocal space decreases.

Contrastingly, see Fig. 2 (bottom), when the volume decreases on relaxation (V1 > V1), the length of the G-vectors decreases. The effective Ecutoff should increase but this does not improve the situation, as it creates an artificial pressure. The reciprocal space grid points are effectively sparser. If the calculation restarts, the basis is reset, so the number of G-vectors decreases for the smaller real space cell.

Figure 2. Cell shape and lattice positions are kept constant, while the volume V is free to change (ISIF = 7). The initial volume V1 changes to the final volume V2. Two cases are given, one for volume increasing on relaxation (top) and one for it decreasing (bottom). The change in real space is given on the left, while the change in reciprocal space and the subsequent effect on the G-vectors is given on the right. Blue is the initial basis, while red is the new, restarted basis. The relation between Ecutoff, NPW, and G-vectors is given for the initial and final volumes.

Alternatively, the shape of the cell could change. As the shape changes, the G-vectors continue to be directed along the lattice coordinates, meaning that some shorten while others lengthen, see Fig. 3. This results in a shift from a spherical basis, where all G-vectors are of equal length, to one where some are stretched and others compressed, i.e. an ellipsoid. This changes the effective Ecutoff along each lattice parameter. On resetting the calculation, the cutoff is once again spherical. This draws an analogy to the symmetry breaking of the Bravais lattice seen for gradient-corrected functionals (cf. GGA_COMPAT), where the spherical symmetry of the G-vectors is broken for non-cubic cells.

Figure 3. Cell volume and lattice positions are kept constant, while the shape is free to change (ISIF = 5). The shape changes from cubic to hexagonal. The blue spherical basis changes to the red ellipsoid basis, along the direction of the sheer. On restarting, a spherical basis returns.

References