problem with energy convergence
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
problem with energy convergence
Dear Vasp users,
I am running some calculations and getting very strange result in energy decreasing it looks like that :
0 0.84891300 -394.766210 0
1 0.83329900 -394.774032 0.007822
2 0.54520900 -394.915302 -0.149092
3 0.53173100 8641.82598 9036.59
4 0.29672800 2757.622456 3152.39
5 0.29897400 -395.021465 -0.255255
6 0.22045900 33417.01410 33811.8
7 0.20961300 4493.151421 4887.92
8 0.16533100 165.895852 560.662
9 0.14155300 -395.108357 -0.342147
I made my super cell and it is like that on the axis
X 28.8? Y 2.84? Z 39.80?
and my KPOINTS file is like that,
Automatic Mesh
0
Monkhorst-Pack
2 8 1
0. 0. 0.
Does any one knows what is the reason of this mess, I really appreciate any help.
best regards,
I am running some calculations and getting very strange result in energy decreasing it looks like that :
0 0.84891300 -394.766210 0
1 0.83329900 -394.774032 0.007822
2 0.54520900 -394.915302 -0.149092
3 0.53173100 8641.82598 9036.59
4 0.29672800 2757.622456 3152.39
5 0.29897400 -395.021465 -0.255255
6 0.22045900 33417.01410 33811.8
7 0.20961300 4493.151421 4887.92
8 0.16533100 165.895852 560.662
9 0.14155300 -395.108357 -0.342147
I made my super cell and it is like that on the axis
X 28.8? Y 2.84? Z 39.80?
and my KPOINTS file is like that,
Automatic Mesh
0
Monkhorst-Pack
2 8 1
0. 0. 0.
Does any one knows what is the reason of this mess, I really appreciate any help.
best regards,
Last edited by Leny on Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
problem with energy convergence
That is a very strange problem, you should give more information about your calculation. e.g. your POSCAR and INCAR, etc.
Last edited by liuhongfei on Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
problem with energy convergence
Hi,
I am calculating adsorption energy of 1H atom on Pt (fcc110) and the surface is big with 11 microfacets, here is my INCAR:
# Regular
SYSTEM = Pt_1H
ISYM = 0
NSW = 200
EDIFF = 0.1E-4
EDIFFG = -0.01
ENCUT = 450
GGA = RP
LWAVE = .FALSE.
LCHARG = .FALSE.
PREC = medium
ISIF = 0
IDIPOL = 3
# ISPIN = 2
# Speedup
NPAR = 8
NSIM = 4
IALGO = 48
LPLANE = .TRUE.
LREAL = Auto
# Optiizers
IBRION = 3
POTIM = 0.0
IOPT = 2
This started happening after I made my super cell bigger to 114 Pt.
Regards,
I am calculating adsorption energy of 1H atom on Pt (fcc110) and the surface is big with 11 microfacets, here is my INCAR:
# Regular
SYSTEM = Pt_1H
ISYM = 0
NSW = 200
EDIFF = 0.1E-4
EDIFFG = -0.01
ENCUT = 450
GGA = RP
LWAVE = .FALSE.
LCHARG = .FALSE.
PREC = medium
ISIF = 0
IDIPOL = 3
# ISPIN = 2
# Speedup
NPAR = 8
NSIM = 4
IALGO = 48
LPLANE = .TRUE.
LREAL = Auto
# Optiizers
IBRION = 3
POTIM = 0.0
IOPT = 2
This started happening after I made my super cell bigger to 114 Pt.
Regards,
Last edited by Leny on Thu May 03, 2012 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
- License Nr.: 5-67
- Location: Germany
problem with energy convergence
So, how was the structure before?
It's pobably a hexagonal cell, so use Gamma-centred KPOINTS. And change the 2 8 1 to a 1 8 1 set or so. You don't need two k-points for a=28\AA ...
Cheers,
alex
It's pobably a hexagonal cell, so use Gamma-centred KPOINTS. And change the 2 8 1 to a 1 8 1 set or so. You don't need two k-points for a=28\AA ...
Cheers,
alex
Last edited by alex on Thu May 03, 2012 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
problem with energy convergence
Hi,
My structure was the same except smaller in size, it is cubic cell and I am adding 1 microfacet each time and when I reached this level to have 6 microfacets then this problem started with.
I changed the KPOINTS to 1 8 1 but it did not solve this problem !
Cheers
My structure was the same except smaller in size, it is cubic cell and I am adding 1 microfacet each time and when I reached this level to have 6 microfacets then this problem started with.
I changed the KPOINTS to 1 8 1 but it did not solve this problem !
Cheers
Last edited by Leny on Tue May 08, 2012 12:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
- License Nr.: 5-67
- Location: Germany
problem with energy convergence
Hi,
did you also change Monkhorst to Gamma?
Cheers,
alex
did you also change Monkhorst to Gamma?
Cheers,
alex
Last edited by alex on Tue May 08, 2012 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
problem with energy convergence
Hi,
No, I did not change Monkhorst to Gamma, here is my KPOINTS file
Automatic Mesh
0
Monkhorst-Pack
1 8 1
0. 0. 0.
I have always used Monkhorst in fact, it is not been a long time since I started to use Vasp and the field in general .
Now a calculation is running and as you told me I left IDIPOL out and until now not any fluctuation has happened with energy if it continues like that until the end then the problem is solved (hopefully).
I will try Gamma centered KPOINTS too to see what happens .
cheers,
No, I did not change Monkhorst to Gamma, here is my KPOINTS file
Automatic Mesh
0
Monkhorst-Pack
1 8 1
0. 0. 0.
I have always used Monkhorst in fact, it is not been a long time since I started to use Vasp and the field in general .
Now a calculation is running and as you told me I left IDIPOL out and until now not any fluctuation has happened with energy if it continues like that until the end then the problem is solved (hopefully).
I will try Gamma centered KPOINTS too to see what happens .
cheers,
Last edited by Leny on Tue May 08, 2012 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
- License Nr.: 5-67
- Location: Germany
problem with energy convergence
That would depend on having a hexagonal unit cell (Gamma-centred) or not (Monkhorst).
So: do you?
So: do you?
Last edited by alex on Tue May 08, 2012 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
problem with energy convergence
No I did not have a hexagonal unit cell, that is good to know, Thank you.
cheers,
cheers,
Last edited by Leny on Tue May 08, 2012 11:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.