For one of my system i calculate i get the following values in which the TOTEN and energy (sigma->0) are the same .
__________________________________________________________
FREE ENERGIE OF THE ION-ELECTRON SYSTEM (eV)
---------------------------------------------------
free energy TOTEN = -719.360085 eV
energy without entropy= -719.360085 eV energy(sigma->0) = -719.360085
---------------------------------------------------
__________________________________________________________
But for few of other systems, i see difference in the three values as below.
-----------------------------------------------------------
FREE ENERGIE OF THE ION-ELECTRON SYSTEM (eV)
---------------------------------------------------
free energy TOTEN = -919.772568 eV
energy without entropy= -919.763224 energy(sigma->0) = -919.767896
-----------------------------------------------
Therefore i wish to ask you which energy should i consider for the Total energy for comparing it with the other structure with similar composition.
Total Energy
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Total Energy
Last edited by kmkumar on Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Hero Member
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
- License Nr.: 5-67
- Location: Germany
Total Energy
You should use 'energy(sigma->0)'.
If both energies are the same it means that there was no effective smearing, because eg. the band gap was large. In the other case you have partially occupied unoccopied states caused by smearing, which is actually a numerical trick to get better convergence. This yields additional entropy, which is _not_ in the system at this point. So that's why there is this correction.
Cheers,
Alex
If both energies are the same it means that there was no effective smearing, because eg. the band gap was large. In the other case you have partially occupied unoccopied states caused by smearing, which is actually a numerical trick to get better convergence. This yields additional entropy, which is _not_ in the system at this point. So that's why there is this correction.
Cheers,
Alex
Last edited by alex on Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:18 am, edited 1 time in total.